One of my book groups recently chose Katharine Graham’s
autobiography, Personal History. I
don’t normally write a review of a book that I haven’t finished, but I spent
almost three weeks reading through page 405 of this hefty tome, so I think I
got a good perspective on both its positive characteristics and its flaws.
In case you aren’t familiar with her, Katharine Graham was
the renowned owner of The Washington Post
for many decades. Having inherited it from her father and her husband,
Katharine took over the job of publisher of what became one of the nation’s top
newspapers at a time when it was very rare for women to even be involved in
business at all, let alone in such a powerful position. However, as an
autobiography, Personal History
covers her entire life, not just her time with The Washington Post.
In fact, the book begins well before her birth, with
background and histories of both her mother’s and father’s sides of the family,
going back many generations. Her father’s family was Jewish, with roots in
France, while her mother’s family was Lutheran, originally from Germany. Their
interfaith marriage was unusual for the time, but her parents were prosperous
and popular public figures, first in New York state and later in Washington,
DC, as her father became more involved with politics. Katharine had a
privileged childhood, surrounded by wealth and opportunity, with her family
splitting their time between multiple huge houses in the city and the country.
When Graham’s father first purchased The Washington Post, it was the smallest and least profitable of 5
major newspapers in the DC area, but he was determined to make it successful.
Under first his leadership, then that of Katharine’s husband, Phil Graham, and
finally, with Katharine herself at the helm, the family newspaper eventually
became the top-notch, respected newspaper that it is today. Along the way,
Katharine experienced a fair amount of tragedy in her life as well, including
the death of her husband.
At 625 pages, Personal
History is a very long book but also a very dense book, packed full of
details, names, dates, and other minutiae. Despite its title, it is far more
than just a personal history of Katharine’s life but also a chronicle of her
family history, a detailed history of The
Washington Post (and the family also owned Newsweek), and an intricate insider’s view of politics from the
1920’s through the 1980’s.
For my taste, there was just too much packed into one book.
While I found much of it interesting, it was a very slow read, and I would have
preferred more personal and less business. The best part of the book was when
she wrote about her husband’s illness and eventual death because those sections
were imbued with an emotion that was often lacking from the rest of the book.
I’m not a fan of celebrity memoirs/autobiographies to begin with – I’d rather
read about “regular” people – and the constant name-dropping in this book was
tiresome to me. Finally, the book could have used a good editor to help cull
and shorten it a bit to highlight the best of it. I had to wonder whether her
editor was afraid to suggest too many changes to such a high-ranking, renowned
journalist/publisher!
Not everyone agrees with me. For instance, the Pulitzer
committee must have thought highly of Personal
History because it won the Pulitzer Prize for Biography/Autobiography in 1998.
Although I wasn’t able to attend our book group discussion, I heard that
ratings on our 10-point scale ranged from 3 to 9.5! Most readers in our group
agreed the writing wasn’t great but some felt the fascinating content
outweighed that.
This book is
fascinating, in many respects. Besides Katharine’s personal life story, you can
see the entire history of modern politics in this book. The Grahams were very close to several U.S. Presidents,
and that inside view is interesting – being in the hotel room when Jack Kennedy
decided on his running mate at the Democratic National Convention, being
whisked off to Lyndon Johnson’s Texas ranch for an impromptu weekend, etc. And,
of course, The Washington Post was
instrumental in breaking the news of Watergate. Katharine’s story also presents
an interesting view of the changing role of women from the 1950’s to the present
day.
All in all, I learned a lot reading (65% of) this book and
found some of it very interesting; however, it was dense and overcrowded with
details and not an easy read. I enjoyed it enough to spend a few weeks on it
for my book group…but not enough to spend another couple of weeks finishing it!
If you have a particular interest in U.S. politics, journalism, or the role of
women in the workplace, then you will probably like this book more than if you
are just looking for an interesting read.
625 pages, Alfred A. Knopf
I tried to like this book too. To be honest I never finished it - I couldn't bring myself to keep reading. I think I read a little over half.
ReplyDelete625 pages isn't a joke!! Good job even reading through 65% :) I think I like what it sounds, but perhaps like you said it was a bit shorter or more precise, it would be a bit more readable for everyone.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your assessment of the book, and I haven't gotten as far as you have. Might press on a little further... Thanks for the post.
ReplyDeleteI've always been interested in writing, publishing and history, but I agree that 625 pages is too long. Maybe they should have broken it into different books. Thanks for sharing on Small Victories Sunday link up.
ReplyDelete