Set on the island of Pianosa in the Mediterranean Sea during WWII, Catch-22 is focused on a U.S. Army Air Squadron. John Yossarian is at the center of the novel, though most of the rest of the squadron have a voice and a story to tell as well. The central conflict in the novel is that one crazy colonel keeps raising the required number of missions for the men. Every time one of them gets close to meeting the requirements and going home, the colonel raises the number of required missions again. Yossarian tries to get sent home on the basis of being crazy, but Catch-22 states that any man who says he is crazy and doesn't want to fly any more missions is proving that he's sane because no sane man would want to fly more dangerous missions. (This novel invented the now well-known term catch-22.) Scenes move from the camp, with tents and officer's club (picture M*A*S*H), to being on leave in Rome to the hospital, where Yossarian spends quite a bit of time trying to get sent home, to some very tense and sobering bombing flights. Through it all, Yossarian is trying to get sent home (by the end of the novel, the required flights has gradually been raised from 40 to 80) and is overwhelmed by the absurdities and madness that surround him.
This is a comic-tragic novel that mixes humor with the horrors of war, sometimes on the same page. When I started reading the book last summer, that uneven tone threw me. I had heard it was funny--and it is--but was put off by the juxtaposition of horrifying war scenes and people dying with humor. When I picked it back up this summer, I was more prepared and had come to recognize that that is the novel's intention: to highlight the absurdities of war by combining the two very different tones: again, think M*A*S*H, which accomplished that same purpose very well. While reading the second half of the novel (with a list of characters by my side to help keep them straight) this summer, I was able to better appreciate how it met this goal. I could be laughing out loud at some farcical scene on one page and sobered by the death of a dozen men on the next. So, I get it now, and I could recognize the genius in that approach, which was revolutionary when the novel was first released in 1955. One other negative, though, remained; the novel is quite misogynistic. The only female characters are whores and nurses (who are sexualized). This is, perhaps, understandable for a WWII novel set during battletimes, perhaps a product of its time as well, and I suspect it was part of its unorthodox approach to try to shock readers, but it was still disturbing to me at times. Other than that, I ended up enjoying the novel, appreciating its groundbreaking approach, and am glad that I finally finished it. I also enjoyed reading some of the end matter, including letters and essays from Heller himself, which provided more insights into the novel's intent and how it came to be.
453 pages, Simon & Schuster
Note: This post contains affiliate links. Purchases from
these links provide a small commission to me (pennies per purchase), to help
offset the time I spend writing for this blog, at no extra cost to you.
Listen to a sample of the audiobook here, from the start of the novel in a funny scene where Yossarian is censoring letters home, and/or download it from Audible.
You can purchase Catch-22 from an independent
bookstore, either locally or online, here:
You can also buy through indie bookstores using Bookshop.
I'm glad you liked it. I've read it three times, and find something new in each reading. But... don't watch the movie based on this book - really bad. The TV series is a bit better but... still, it wasn't the book.
ReplyDeleteWow, 3 times? I'm impressed! I wondered about the TV show - thanks for the tip!
DeleteThis is one of those books I've always heard about but never read. And, of course, I know the phrase Catch-22, but didn't know the context. It must feel good to have finally finished the book.
ReplyDeleteMe, too, Helen, until I finally picked it up last summer!
DeleteI read it when I was young, and I still remember the bitter humor and tragedy. I also remember how I completely accepted the misogyny as just normal for "real books." I'm glad I and the world have made some progress there, even if sometimes it seems the government system is still insane.
ReplyDeleteBeth - Yes, I'm not sure I would have noticed the role of women in the novel when I was younger! Progress is good :)
DeleteI tried to read this a few years ago, and I had problems staying interested. It did feel like a was reading "Mash" material. Well, I bailed on this one.
ReplyDeleteI did, too, the first time, Ruth! This was my second try :)
Delete